On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 08:13 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > include/xen/interface/memory.h | 29 ++++++- > > include/xen/interface/physdev.h | 10 ++ > > ... any changes to the hypervisor interface (didn't look in detail > what is being changed in these two headers) should first be in > at least -unstable before being consumed in any official release > imo.
I'd also like to see at least the interface definitions in the h/v tree if not the implementation right away. The flip side is that we have agreed that the interfaces are not considered set in stone / stable until we've had a chance to review the implementation, so perhaps it is better not to commit them to xen-unstable.hg right away. I don't know what the right answer is. Perhaps we should at a minimum reserve the subop numbers even if we don't yet define what they mean in the Xen tree. Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
