On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:01:15PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
> almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the Linux kernel
> summit, it is being removed.  This will discourage future addition of
> CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL while it is being phased out.
> 
> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <a...@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl |    7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 21a9f5d..37dc932 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1757,6 +1757,13 @@ sub process {
>                       #print "is_start<$is_start> is_end<$is_end> 
> length<$length>\n";
>               }
>  
> +# Discourage the addition of CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL in Kconfig.
> +             if ($realfile =~ /Kconfig/ &&
> +                 $line =~ /.\s*depends on\s+.*\bEXPERIMENTAL\b/) {
> +                     WARN("CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL",
> +                          "Use of CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is deprecated.\n");
> +             }
> +

Seem reasonable.  Should you suggest how they can mark things
experimental?  I assume (EXPERIMENTAL) in the title is now the right
way?

>               if (($realfile =~ /Makefile.*/ || $realfile =~ /Kbuild.*/) &&
>                   ($line =~ /\+(EXTRA_[A-Z]+FLAGS).*/)) {
>                       my $flag = $1;

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to