On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 01:04:40PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote: > Hello Greg, > > > The following changes since commit 6f0c0580b70c89094b3422ba81118c7b959c7556: > > Linux 3.7-rc2 (2012-10-20 12:11:32 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mzx/extcon.git for-next
This isn't a signed-tag to pull from, it looks just like a branch instead. Is it really a signed tag? If so, it sure didn't work like one. > Axel Lin (4): > extcon: adc-jack: Fix checking return value of request_any_context_irq > extcon: adc-jack: Add missing MODULE_LICENSE > extcon: Fix kerneldoc for extcon_set_cable_state and > extcon_set_cable_state_ > extcon: max77693: Use max77693_update_reg for rmw operations > > Chanwoo Choi (1): > extcon: MAX77693: Add platform data for MUIC device to initialize > registers > > Devendra Naga (1): > extcon-max8997: remove usage of ret in > max8997_muic_handle_charger_type_detach > > Jenny TC (1): > extcon : register for cable interest by cable name > > Peter Huewe (2): > extcon: Unregister compat class at module unload to fix oops > extcon: unregister compat link on cleanup > > Sachin Kamat (2): > extcon: Remove duplicate inclusion of extcon.h header file > extcon: Fix return value in extcon_register_interest() > > anish kumar (5): > extcon: standard cable names definition and declaration changed > extcon: optimising the check_mutually_exclusive function > extcon: checkpatch warning removal Why is a checkpatch cleanup for 3.7? Shouldn't that wait for 3.8? Care to redo this? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
