On 10/19/2012 11:34 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > >> I, however, see no reason why we need to do so, since we are now locked >> during the whole deletion (which wasn't necessarily true before). I >> propose a simplification in which we delete it only when there is no >> more going back, so we don't need to add it again. > > Ok lets hope that holding the lock does not cause issues. > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com> > BTW: One of the good things about this set, is that we are naturally exercising cache destruction a lot more than we did before. So if there is any problem, either with this or anything related to cache destruction, it should at least show up a lot more frequently. So far, this does not seem to cause any problems.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
