Hi!
> >> This is a brief summary of our initial filesystem performance study of
> >> f2fs against existing two filesystems in linux: EXT4, NILFS2, and f2fs.
> >>
> >
> > Hmm, flashes are actually optimized for VFAT, right? Can you compare
> > against that?
> >
>
> Do you mean SD-cards? Because, as I can understand, "raw" flash (I mean NAND
> chip) hasn't any special filesystem-related optimization. Moreover, as I
> know, this optimization takes place in the begin of device (because FAT
> metadata is placed in the volume's begin). But if you have several partition
> on a device then you haven't any optimizations for second and next FAT
> partitions. So, in-place modified metadata of f2fs is placed in the begin of
> the volume also.
>
> Or, maybe, do you mean some another special optimization for VFAT?
>
I meant SD-card, sorry. Compare factory-formatted VFAT on SD card with
f2fs running on the same partition.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
