Re: [CFT][PATCH] Re: fat problem in 2.4.2

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:

>       IOW, if it's worth doing at all it probably should be
> on expanding path in vmtruncate() - limit checks are already
> done, but old i_size is still not lost...

The fs where it's important have mmu_private, that's what I use to decide
whether to expand or truncate.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/