Alexander Viro wrote: > > Evil idea of the day: non-directory (even non-existant) mount points and > > non-directory mounts. So then "mount --bind /etc/foo /dev/bar" works. > > Try it. It _does_ work. Yeah, mount --bind is cool, I've been using it on one of my projects today. But - maybe I'm just not thinking creatively enough - what are the advantages of mount --bind versus just symlinking? Also, I tried mount --bind fileone filetwo, and it fails if filetwo doesn't exist. ('mount point filetwo doesn't exist'). Is that supposed to work? (using mount from latest redhat beta) BTW, pivot_root is nifty, too. ;-) regards, David -- David L. Parsley Network Administrator Roanoke College - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespace... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process name... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Marco d'Itri
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... David L. Parsley
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces fo... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Li... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux Alexander Viro