Patch 35f2b0bd59 "ARM: shmobile: Move definition of shmobile_init_late()
to header" moved the definition of the shmobile_init_late function, but
dropped the __init annotation, which is now causing warnings because
the function calls shmobile_suspend_init, which is also marked init.

Without this patch, building kota2_defconfig results in:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xb7c8): Section mismatch in reference from the 
function shmobile_init_late() to the function .init.text:shmobile_suspend_init()
The function shmobile_init_late() references
the function __init shmobile_suspend_init().
This is often because shmobile_init_late lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of shmobile_suspend_init is wrong.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl>
Cc: Magnus Damm <d...@opensource.se>
Cc: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h 
b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h
index ed77ab8..d47e215 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/common.h
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static inline int shmobile_cpu_is_dead(unsigned int cpu) { 
return 1; }
 
 extern void shmobile_smp_init_cpus(unsigned int ncores);
 
-static inline void shmobile_init_late(void)
+static inline void __init shmobile_init_late(void)
 {
        shmobile_suspend_init();
        shmobile_cpuidle_init();
-- 
1.7.10

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to