On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:54 PM, "Jan H. Schönherr" <schn...@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > Am 08.10.2012 21:24, schrieb Kay Sievers: >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:49 PM, "Jan H. Schönherr" >> >>>> Given that I'm able to fix the racing case, would you be in favor of >>>> this approach, or should we stick to the earlier version? >>> >>> I'm open to everything that makes sense. Let's see how it looks and we >>> can decide when we have something that passes the tests. >> >> Jan, >> any updates, did you try something else? >> Or should we merge the first version for now? > > I'm working on it, though I cannot spend as much time as I want. :) > > My current version does mostly well for race-printk()s, now. But > there's still one issue to resolve and some polishing to do. > > If we can afford to wait a little longer, we might get a nicer > solution (and avoid a possible mostly-revert later).
Sure, no hurry, I was just going through my TODO emails. :) Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
