2012-10-05 (금), 14:09 -0700, Boaz Harrosh: > On 10/05/2012 10:54 AM, Dan Luedtke wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:56 +0900, 김재극 wrote: > >> + __le32 i_atime; /* Access time */ > >> + __le32 i_ctime; /* inode Change time */ > >> + __le32 i_mtime; /* Modification time */ > >> + __le32 i_btime; /* file creation time*/ > > > > It's probably to late, but have you considered using 64 bit timestamps? > > In LanyFS we use 64 bit and I'm very interested in reasoning for 32 bit > > timestamps. > > > > Yes and please don't make them millisecond resolution. This is a real > headache. > From the like of make to NFS to reboot/corruption recovery... the list is > endless > > Please make it nanoseconds resolution. >
Ok, I'll take a look at this. Thanks, > > Regards > > > > Dan > > > > Thanks > Boaz > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Jaegeuk Kim Samsung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
