* Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> [2012-09-30 21:42:24]: > install_breakpoint() is called under mm->mmap_sem, this protects > set_swbp() but not uprobe_copy_insn(). Two or more different tasks > can call install_breakpoint()->uprobe_copy_insn() at the same time, > this leads to numerous problems if UPROBE_COPY_INSN is not set. > > Just for example, the second copy_insn() can corrupt the already > analyzed/fixuped uprobe->arch.insn and race with handle_swbp(). > > This patch simply adds uprobe->copy_mutex to serialize this code. > We could probably reuse ->consumer_rwsem, but this would mean that > consumer->handler() can not use mm->mmap_sem, not good. > > Note: this is another temporary ugly hack until we move this logic > into uprobe_register(). > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Given that we copy just for the first install, and register not being a performance path, Can we use a single mutex instead of a per-uprobe mutex. Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
