On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <878610000.983061717@tiny> you wrote: > > Exactly. The tail conversion code depends heavily on the page up to date > > bit being set right. It is more than possible that I've screwed up > > something there, and the code thinks a page is valid when it really isn't. > > I have seen null byte corruptions in syslog files with ext2 in various > kernels. So perhaps it is a general VFS problem? aol.. none since 2.4.0 release here though. -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- reiserfs: still problems with tail conversion Erik Mouw
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with tail convers... Chris Mason
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with tail con... Erik Mouw
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with tail... Michal Gornisiewicz
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with ... Meino Christian Cramer
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with tail... thunder7
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with tail... Ken Moffat
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with ... Alan Cox
- Re: reiserfs: still problems ... Chris Mason
- Re: reiserfs: still probl... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: reiserfs: still p... Mike Galbraith
- Re: reiserfs: still p... Alan Cox
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with tail... Erik Mouw
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with ... Erik Mouw
- [PATCH] Re: reiserfs: still p... Chris Mason
- Re: [PATCH] Re: reiserfs:... Erik Mouw
- Re: [PATCH] Re: reise... Erik Mouw
- Re: [PATCH] Re: reiserfs:... Ken Moffat
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with ... Chris Mason
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with tail con... Oliver Teuber
- Re: reiserfs: still problems with tail convers... John E. Adams