Jeff Garzik wrote: (about optimizing kernel network code for busmastering NIC's) > Disclaimer: This is 2.5, repeat, 2.5 material. Related question: are there any 100Mbit NICs with cpu's onboard? Something mainstream/affordable?(i.e. not 1G ethernet) Just recently someone posted asking some technical question about ARMlinux for and intel card with 2 1G ports, 8 100M ports, an onboard ARM cpu and 4 other uControllers... seems to me that ultimately the networking code should go in that direction: immagine having the *NIC* do most of this... no cache pollution problems... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: LILO error with 2.4.3-pre1... Alan Cox
- Re: New net features for added performance Jeff Garzik
- Re: New net features for added performance Andi Kleen
- Re: New net features for added performance Rusty Russell
- Re: New net features for added performance David S. Miller
- Re: New net features for added performance Andi Kleen
- Re: New net features for added performance David S. Miller
- Re: New net features for added perform... Jeremy Jackson
- Re: New net features for added performance kuznet
- Re: New net features for added performance Michael Richardson
- Re: New net features for added performance Jeremy Jackson
- Re: New net features for added performance Werner Almesberger
- Re: New net features for added performance Jonathan Morton
- Re: New net features for added performance Noah Romer
- Re: New net features for added performance Jes Sorensen
- Re: New net features for added performance Andrew Morton
- Re: New net features for added performance Jeremy Jackson
- Re: New net features for added performance Werner Almesberger
- Re: New net features for added performance Jes Sorensen
- Re: New net features for added performance David S. Miller
- Re: New net features for added performance Jeff Garzik