> I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
> but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
> feel free to modify and resend to akpm, Please.
> 

A full revert is overkill. Can the following patch be tested as a
potential replacement please?

---8<---
mm: compaction: Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and 
isolate_freepages_range() -fix1

CMA is reported to be broken in next-20120926. Minchan Kim pointed out
that this was due to nr_scanned != total_isolated in the case of CMA
because PageBuddy pages are one scan but many isolations in CMA. This
patch should address the problem.

This patch is a fix for
mm-compaction-acquire-the-zone-lock-as-late-as-possible-fix-2.patch

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
---
 mm/compaction.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 8250b69..d6e260a 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct 
compact_control *cc,
 {
        int nr_scanned = 0, total_isolated = 0;
        struct page *cursor, *valid_page = NULL;
+       unsigned long nr_strict_required = end_pfn - blockpfn;
        unsigned long flags;
        bool locked = false;
 
@@ -343,10 +344,10 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct 
compact_control *cc,
 
        /*
         * If strict isolation is requested by CMA then check that all the
-        * pages scanned were isolated. If there were any failures, 0 is
+        * pages requested were isolated. If there were any failures, 0 is
         * returned and CMA will fail.
         */
-       if (strict && nr_scanned != total_isolated)
+       if (strict && nr_strict_required != total_isolated)
                total_isolated = 0;
 
        if (locked)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to