On Thu 27-09-12 17:46:48, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 27.09.2012 17:12, schrieb Jan Kara:
> > Just some thoughts about your oops:
> >The assertion which fails is:
> >BUG_ON(!list_empty(&bh->b_assoc_buffers));
> >
> >Now b_assoc_buffers isn't used very much. In particular ext4 which you seem
> >to be using doesn't use this list at all (except when mounted in nojournal
> >mode but that doesn't seem to be your case). That would point rather
> >strongly at a memory corruption issue.
> >
> >So if you can reproduce the oops, it might be interesting to print
> >bh->b_assoc_buffers.next and &bh->b_assoc_buffers.next if the list is found
> >to be non-empty.
>
> Hmm, a loose pointer would explain it all too. Especially the cases
> when I just have seen wrong content in the archive without having
> any oops. I try to reproduce it with
>
> pr_info("AHO: %p %p\n", bh->b_assoc_buffers.next,
> &bh->b_assoc_buffers.next);
> after the BUG_ON().
It should have been:
if (!list_empty(&bh->b_assoc_buffers))
pr_info("AHO: %p %p\n", bh->b_assoc_buffers.next,
&bh->b_assoc_buffers.next);
*before* BUG_ON().
What you saw in the logs were just pointers showing the list is empty
(naturally as otherwise we'd see the BUG_ON trigger).
Honza
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
