On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Ivan Passos wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Ion Badulescu wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:01:05 -0800 (PST), Ivan Passos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Sometimes when I reboot the system, as soon as the eepro100 module is
> > > loaded, I start to get these msgs on the screen:
> > >
> > > eth0: card reports no resources.
> > > eth0: card reports no RX buffers.
> > > eth0: card reports no resources.
> > > eth0: card reports no RX buffers.
> > > eth0: card reports no resources.
> > > eth0: card reports no RX buffers.
> > > (...)
> >
> > Does the following patch, taken from 2.4.1, help?
>
> I'm currently testing. I'll get back to you soon (have to reboot the
> system a lot to make sure it's really solved ... :)).
Yes, the patch did solve the problem.
Alan, could you please include this patch on your 2.2.19pre series (if
it's not already included)??
Ion, thanks again for your help!!
Later,
Ivan
--- linux-2.2.18/drivers/net/eepro100-old.c Fri Feb 2 15:30:23 2001
+++ linux-2.2.18/drivers/net/eepro100.c Fri Feb 2 15:33:19 2001
@@ -751,6 +751,7 @@
This takes less than 10usec and will easily finish before the next
action. */
outl(PortReset, ioaddr + SCBPort);
+ inl(ioaddr + SCBPort);
/* Honor PortReset timing. */
udelay(10);
@@ -839,6 +840,7 @@
#endif /* kernel_bloat */
outl(PortReset, ioaddr + SCBPort);
+ inl(ioaddr + SCBPort);
/* Honor PortReset timing. */
udelay(10);
@@ -1062,6 +1064,9 @@
/* Set the segment registers to '0'. */
wait_for_cmd_done(ioaddr + SCBCmd);
outl(0, ioaddr + SCBPointer);
+ /* impose a delay to avoid a bug */
+ inl(ioaddr + SCBPointer);
+ udelay(10);
outb(RxAddrLoad, ioaddr + SCBCmd);
wait_for_cmd_done(ioaddr + SCBCmd);
outb(CUCmdBase, ioaddr + SCBCmd);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
