> Also, does the code in fact support only FX2, neither older chips nor > newer FX3? It also does support the FX(1), but not FX3. At first sight, it looks like FX3 got another register interface.
> If FX is also supported then perhaps still rename the option, > although I think renaming is unrelated to the build problems. > > I think it makes sense to call the option after the "highest" > supported chip. That's what it is. ;) I would be happy to re-rename this option to USB_EZUSB somewhere in the future, but i think it is the best option to stick with this for at least one major version to avoid build errors. > > > //Peter > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
