On 09/26/2012 01:47 PM, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
>> Shouldn't we warn if that fails?
> printk("Cannot set affinity for irq %i\n", irq);
> This is the warning when set affinity failed.
>
I know.. What I meant is, the code warns only if chip->irq_set_affinity
is NULL and doesn't care if chip->irq_set_affinity was not NULL and
the function failed to set the affinity (ie., when chip->irq_set_affinity()
returns error). In other words, I meant to say that this is one more
case where we need to warn about our failure to set the irq affinity.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
