On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:11:57PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > No cache should ever pass that as a creation flag, since this bit is > used to mark an internal decision of the slab about object placement. We > can just ignore this bit if it happens to be passed (such as when > duplicating a cache in the kmem memcg patches) > > Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glom...@parallels.com> > CC: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com> > CC: Pekka Enberg <penb...@cs.helsinki.fi> > CC: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com> > --- > mm/slab.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c > index a7ed60f..ccf496c 100644 > --- a/mm/slab.c > +++ b/mm/slab.c > @@ -2373,6 +2373,7 @@ __kmem_cache_create (struct kmem_cache *cachep, > unsigned long flags) > int err; > size_t size = cachep->size; > > + flags &= ~CFLGS_OFF_SLAB;
A comment explaining why this is necessary wouldn't hurt. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
