"David S. Miller" wrote: > > Jordan Mendelson writes: > > Now, if it didn't have the side effect of dropping packets left and > > right after ~4000 open connections (simultaneously), I could finally > > move our production system to 2.4.x. > > There is no reason my patch should have this effect. My guess is that the fast path prevented the need for looking up the destination in some structure which is limited to ~4K entries (route table?). Jordan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstances (Re: netdev... Ookhoi
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstances (R... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstance... Ookhoi
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstance... Ookhoi
- RE: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstance... Vibol Hou
- RE: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstance... Vibol Hou
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstance... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstance... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumst... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circ... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circ... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circ... Simon Kirby
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4 tcp very slow under certain circumstances (R... Gregory Maxwell