Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2

[Martin Mares]

Hello!

> To have O(1) you've to have the number of hash entries > number of files and a
> really good hasing function.

No, if you enlarge the hash table twice (and re-hash everything) every time the
table fills up, the load factor of the table keeps small and everything is O(1)
amortized, of course if you have a good hashing function. If you are really
smart and re-hash incrementally, you can get O(1) worst case complexity, but
the multiplicative constant is large.

> To be sincere, here is pretty daylight :)

:)
                                                                Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/