On 09/17/2012 11:36 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:27:17PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:53:51PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>
>> Would it be possible to have all '*add_event' more obvious for usage.
>> Also following code is duplicated after each call of __add_event:
>>
>>       evsel = __add_event(idx, &attr, pmu_event_name(head_config),
>>                           pmu->cpus);
>>       if (!evsel) {
>>               *idx = orig_idx;
>>               free_event_list(list);
>>               return -ENOMEM;
>>       }
>>       list_add_tail(&evsel->node, list);
> 
> Any update here? Yan, did you look at folding Jiri's patch? I'm merging
> the first bit, the kernel part, that was Acked by Ingo and Peter,
> waiting on this part, looking at 2/3 now
> 

Hi,

This patch still need some improvement, I don't expect it to get merged.
Please merged the patch 1 and patch 2 first. I will send a new one soon.

Regards
Yan, Zheng

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to