On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:43:12PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:55:29PM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote: > > From: Jens Taprogge <jens.tapro...@taprogge.org> > > > > This way interrupt handling becomes independent of the channel number. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge <jens.tapro...@taprogge.org> > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <sigles...@igalia.com> > > --- > > @@ -213,7 +206,7 @@ static int ipoctal_irq_handler(void *arg) > > } > > > > /* RX data */ > > - if (isr_rx_rdy && (sr & SR_RX_READY)) { > > + if ((isr && channel->isr_rx_rdy_mask) && (sr & SR_RX_READY)) { > ^^ > Bitwise AND intended here I think. >
Never mind. It gets silently fixed in the next patch. Regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/