Hi Arnaldo and Robert, On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:48:15 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Robert Richter escreveu: >> On 09.09.12 01:54:39, tip-bot for Namhyung Kim wrote: >> >> # perf record -e cycles -aq sleep 1 ; perf report -n --sort comm,dso | sed >> '/%/q;d' ; \ >> perf record -e cycles -aq sleep 1 | perf report -n --sort comm,dso | sed >> '/%/q;d' >> 99.86% 11804 swapper [kernel.kallsyms] >> 91.57% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] >> ^^^^^^ >> number of samples missing >> >> Moving and changing the code at the same time make the patch >> unreviewable. So no clue that's the problem here. > > Yeah, that was unfortunate (movind and changing), we need to try hard > not to do that...
Okay, will be careful next time. > > Anyway, Namhyung, can you take a look at this? Sure, I'll take a look. Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
