On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:30:19AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 10:05 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:53:51PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> >> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z....@intel.com>
> >>
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> >> +int parse_events_add_pmu(struct list_head **_list, int *idx,
> >> char *name, struct list_head *head_config)
> >> {
> >> struct perf_event_attr attr;
> >> - struct perf_pmu *pmu;
> >> + struct list_head *list;
> >> + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
> >> + struct perf_evsel *evsel, *first = NULL;
> >> + int orig_idx = *idx;
> >>
> >> - pmu = perf_pmu__find(name);
> >> - if (!pmu)
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> + list = malloc(sizeof(*list));
> >> + if (!list)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(list);
> >
> > list should be allocated only if (!*_list)) same as in add_event function
> >
> > I haven't test, but I think you'll leak/loose events if there's another pmu
> > event defined after ','
> >
>
> I think *_list is always NULL, because the code in parse-event.y is:
>
> ---
> PE_NAME '/' event_config '/'
> {
> struct parse_events_data__events *data = _data;
> struct list_head *list = NULL;
>
> ABORT_ON(parse_events_add_pmu(&list, &data->idx, $1, $3));
> parse_events__free_terms($3);
> $$ = list;
> }
>
> ---
>
> Regards
> Yan, Zheng
ouch, we update it in parse_events_update_lists.. then the '!list' check
is not needed.. I haven't realized we changed that, sry.
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
