I had a few style comments on this patchset.  Nothing that couldn't
be fixed later.

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:51:41AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> From: Jens Taprogge <jens.tapro...@taprogge.org>
> 
> Provide get_clockrate, set_clockrate, get_error, get_timeout and reset_timeout
> callbacks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Taprogge <jens.tapro...@taprogge.org>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez <sigles...@igalia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c |  107 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 107 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c 
> b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
> index 4383953..861b00d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ipack/bridges/tpci200.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,20 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include "tpci200.h"
>  
> +static u16 tpci200_status_timeout[] = {
> +     TPCI200_A_TIMEOUT,
> +     TPCI200_B_TIMEOUT,
> +     TPCI200_C_TIMEOUT,
> +     TPCI200_D_TIMEOUT,
> +};
> +
> +static u16 tpci200_status_error[] = {
> +     TPCI200_A_ERROR,
> +     TPCI200_B_ERROR,
> +     TPCI200_C_ERROR,
> +     TPCI200_D_ERROR,
> +};
> +
>  static struct ipack_bus_ops tpci200_bus_ops;
>  
>  static int tpci200_slot_unregister(struct ipack_device *dev);
> @@ -507,6 +521,94 @@ out_unlock:
>       return res;
>  }
>  
> +static int tpci200_get_clockrate(struct ipack_device *dev)
> +{
> +     struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +     __le16 __iomem *addr;

The point of the underscores in the __le16 is that you don't want to
pollute user space headers in glibc with a bunch of kernel typedefs.
It is not needed here.  (Or if it is, then we would need to replace
the u16 uses as well).

> +
> +     if (!tpci200)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->control[dev->slot];
> +     return (ioread16(addr) & TPCI200_CLK32) ? 32 : 8;
> +}
> +
> +static int tpci200_set_clockrate(struct ipack_device *dev, int mherz)
> +{
> +     struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +     __le16 __iomem *addr;
> +     u16 reg;
> +
> +     if (!tpci200)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->control[dev->slot];
> +
> +     /* Ensure the control register is not changed by another task after we
> +      * have read it. */
> +     mutex_lock(&tpci200->mutex);
> +     reg = ioread16(addr);
> +     switch (mherz) {
> +     case 8:
> +             reg &= ~(TPCI200_CLK32); break;
> +     case 32:
> +             reg |= TPCI200_CLK32; break;

Put the breaks on the next line so that we can see them.  At first I
thought it fell through.

> +     default:
> +             mutex_unlock(&tpci200->mutex);
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +     iowrite16(reg, addr);
> +     mutex_unlock(&tpci200->mutex);
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tpci200_get_error(struct ipack_device *dev)
> +{
> +     struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +     __le16 __iomem *addr;
> +     u16 mask;
> +
> +     if (!tpci200)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->status;
> +     mask = tpci200_status_error[dev->slot];
> +     return (ioread16(addr) & mask) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tpci200_get_timeout(struct ipack_device *dev)
> +{
> +     struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +     __le16 __iomem *addr;
> +     u16 mask;
> +
> +     if (!tpci200)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->status;
> +     mask = tpci200_status_timeout[dev->slot];
> +
> +     return (ioread16(addr) & mask) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tpci200_reset_timeout(struct ipack_device *dev)
> +{
> +     struct tpci200_board *tpci200 = check_slot(dev);
> +     __le16 __iomem *addr;
> +     u16 mask;
> +
> +     if (!tpci200)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     addr = &tpci200->info->interface_regs->status;
> +     mask = tpci200_status_timeout[dev->slot];
> +
> +     iowrite16(mask, addr);
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +

Only one blank line is here.

>  static void tpci200_uninstall(struct tpci200_board *tpci200)
>  {
>       int i;
> @@ -524,6 +626,11 @@ static struct ipack_bus_ops tpci200_bus_ops = {
>       .request_irq = tpci200_request_irq,
>       .free_irq = tpci200_free_irq,
>       .remove_device = tpci200_slot_unregister,
> +     .get_clockrate = tpci200_get_clockrate,
> +     .set_clockrate = tpci200_set_clockrate,
> +     .get_error     = tpci200_get_error,
> +     .get_timeout   = tpci200_get_timeout,
> +     .reset_timeout = tpci200_reset_timeout,
>  };
>  
>  static int tpci200_install(struct tpci200_board *tpci200)
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org
> http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to