On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 06:55:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > > If nobody else thinks this patch is better, let's at least add a comment in > > __dev_printk() and __netdev_printk() to fix dynamic debug, if these are > > changed. > > Or maybe make dynamic_emit_prefix a public function > and move the __dynamic_<foo>_printk functions to > nearby the __<foo>_printk functions so it's easier to > see that changing one requires the other to change. >
ok, that makes sense to me. Thanks, -Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
