3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> commit 67a806d9499353fabd5b5ff07337f3aa88a1c3ba upstream. The following build error occurred during an alpha build: net/core/sock.c:274:36: error: initializer element is not constant Dave Anglin says: > Here is the line in sock.i: > > struct static_key memalloc_socks = ((struct static_key) { .enabled = > ((atomic_t) { (0) }) }); The above line contains two compound literals. It also uses a designated initializer to initialize the field enabled. A compound literal is not a constant expression. The location of the above statement isn't fully clear, but if a compound literal occurs outside the body of a function, the initializer list must consist of constant expressions. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Cree <[email protected]> Acked-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> --- arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h index 3bb7ffe..c2cbe4f 100644 --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/atomic.h @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ */ -#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) ( (atomic_t) { (i) } ) -#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) ( (atomic64_t) { (i) } ) +#define ATOMIC_INIT(i) { (i) } +#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) { (i) } #define atomic_read(v) (*(volatile int *)&(v)->counter) #define atomic64_read(v) (*(volatile long *)&(v)->counter) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
