* Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> [2012-09-07 17:50:57]:
> On 09/07, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> (and thanks, I'll fix the typo in 2/7 you pointed out)
>
> > > void arch_uprobe_enable_step(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
> > > {
> > > - struct uprobe_task *utask = current->utask;
> > > - struct arch_uprobe_task *autask = &utask->autask;
> > > + struct task_struct *task = current;
> >
> > Any particular reason to use task instead of current?
>
> No particular reason, and I think in this case asm will be the same.
>
> Please let me know if you prefer to remove this variable, I'll redo
> this patch.
No, the patch is fine.
I have no problem with the additional variable, I was just curious if
you had any other plans that needed that a exta variable that alls.
--
thanks and regards
Srikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
