On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 7 September 2012 10:21, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Turquette, Mike <mturque...@ti.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Turquette <mturque...@ti.com> wrote: >>>> I'll take this series into clk-next. >>> >>> Oops, I forgot to ask about patch #3. Which tree do you want that to >>> go through? >> >> Just take it all through your tree if there are no major conflicts. >> Acked-by etc. > > Agree, it makes it simpler to go through Mike's clock tree. At least > let's try it out. > I will likely have similar patch series with cross dependencies later > on, so this can be a good first test and hopefully it works.
That will probably hit the next merge window anyway - these patches will go into v3.7 as it looks, then you can finalize the next series for v3.8. > Although, don't we need an ack by Samuel Ortiz for the patch on mfd? > "mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock" Confused, isn't that patch part of the latter series, and not part of what Mike merged? > Or, is it enough with Linus ack since he is the maintainer of that > specific mfd file I have patched? That's up to Mike, but I hardly think Sam is going to get very angry about this if we merge it. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
