The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't
think this will fix any bugs.
Before:
[ 7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[ 7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0
[ 7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[ 7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0
[ 7.639802] drm_prime_init_file ee372390
[ 7.639810] drm_prime_init_file ee372390
[ 8.473316] drm_prime_init_file ee356390
[ 8.473331] drm_prime_init_file ee356390
After:
[ 6.363842] drm_prime_init_file edc2e5d0
[ 6.363994] drm_prime_destroy_file edc2e5d0
[ 6.364260] drm_prime_init_file edc2e750
[ 8.004837] drm_prime_init_file ee36ded0
Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <m...@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312....@samsung.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
index ebacec6..a27b8ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c
@@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ static int exynos_drm_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct
drm_file *file)
if (!file_priv)
return -ENOMEM;
- drm_prime_init_file_private(&file->prime);
file->driver_priv = file_priv;
return exynos_drm_subdrv_open(dev, file);
@@ -184,7 +183,6 @@ static void exynos_drm_preclose(struct drm_device *dev,
e->base.destroy(&e->base);
}
}
- drm_prime_destroy_file_private(&file->prime);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags);
exynos_drm_subdrv_close(dev, file);
--
1.7.7.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
