> need fat pointers, which would make sizeof (long) /= sizeof (void *), > which would break quite some software, I think. There are plenty of architectures where sizeof long != sizeof (void *). If your code makes bad assumptions and a bounds checking cc breaks it then its progress. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fi... Peter Samuelson
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-sma... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-sma... Andreas Bombe
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-sma... Xavier Bestel
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-sma... Jeremy Jackson
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-sma... Xavier Bestel
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-sma... Andreas Bombe
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-sma... Xavier Bestel
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Jeremy Jackson
- Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Florian Weimer
- Alan Cox