Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit : [...] > When is that specification for 2.4 drivers going to be available? Talk > about "stifling the marketplace"!!! Vendors cant even write reliable > drivers if they want to. May be said vendors should give a look at l-k between 2.2 and 2.4 instead of spending their time ranting at low quality of source code on l-k, FreeBSD-hackers and elsewhere, shouldn't they ? -- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovat... Alan Cox
- Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovat... Keith Owens
- Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovat... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Francois Romieu
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dennis
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Mohammad A. Haque
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dennis
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dennis
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Francois Romieu
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Alan Cox
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dan Hollis
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... Neal Dias
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... Dennis
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Michael Bacarella
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... James A. Sutherland
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... David D.W. Downey
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... [way O.T.] John Cavan