On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarca...@redhat.com> wrote: > I would suggest to do the strict fix as above in as patch 1/8 and push > it in -mm, and to do only the optimization removal in 3/8. I think > we want it in -stable too later, so it'll make life easier to > cherry-pick the commit if it's merged independently.
All right. So I did this and the strict fix got into Andrew's tree as mm-fix-potential-anon_vma-locking-issue-in-mprotect.patch Andrew: when you try applying this series, this patch (2/7) won't apply due to the strict fix being already there. Please just skip it (and replace patch 4/7 with the replacement I'm about to send, so that we end up with the same end state) -- Michel "Walken" Lespinasse A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
