"David D.W. Downey" wrote: > > Seriously though folks, look at who's doing this! > > They've already tried once to sue 'Linux', were told they couldn't because > Linux is a non-entity (or at least one that they can not effectively sue > due to the classification Linux holds), ... --- Not having a long memory on these things, do you have an article or reference on this -- I'd love to read about that one. Sue Linux? For what? Competing? Perhaps by saying Open Source is a threat to the "American Way", they mean they can't effectively 'sue', buy up or destroy it? -l -- L A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Voice: (650) 933-5338 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux stifles inno... Dan Hollis
- re: XOR [ was: Linux... David Relson
- re: XOR [ was: Linux... Dan Hollis
- re: XOR [ was: Linux... Jonathan Morton
- re: XOR [ was: Linux... David Relson
- Re: XOR [ was: Linux ... brian
- Re: XOR [ was: Linux ... Dan Hollis
- Re: Linux stifles inno... James Sutherland
- Re: Linux stifles inno... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: Linux stifles inno... James Sutherland
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... LA Walsh
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Helge Hafting
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... James Sutherland
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Helge Hafting
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Joseph Pingenot
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Andrew Scott
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Jesse Pollard
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dennis
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Alan Cox
- [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles i... Henning P. Schmiedehausen
- Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux ... Russell King