Manfred Spraul wrote: > A very simple test might be > > cpu 1: > cpu 2: Ben's test uses only one CPU. > Now start with variants: > change to read only instead of not present > a and b in the same way of the tlb, in a different way. > change pte with write, change with lock; > . > . > . > > But you'll never prove that you tested every combination. Indeed. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Manfred Spraul
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Jamie Lokier
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Linus Torvalds
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Manfred Spraul
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Ben LaHaise
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Linus Torvalds
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Ben LaHaise
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Linus Torvalds
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Jamie Lokier
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Manfred Spraul
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Jamie Lokier
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Hugh Dickins
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Ben LaHaise
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Linus Torvalds
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Ben LaHaise
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Linus Torvalds
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Jamie Lokier
- Re: x86 ptep_get_and_clear question Linus Torvalds