Oh God. You're right. But who's going to patent the patent on the patent? *ad infinitum* -----Original Message----- From: David Woodhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Woodhouse Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 11:26 AM To: Mark Haney Cc: James Sutherland; Rik van Riel; Alan Olsen; David D.W. Downey; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux stifles innovation... [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Okay, so if we are going to get real stupid about the whole thing, I > wonder if Microsloth is going to patent the patent? Filing nuisance patents for obvious stuff which shouldn't ever get granted is a viable business method and as such is patentable in the US. After all, what patent officer is going to point out the prior art? :) -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... Alan Olsen
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... dave
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... Richard B. Johnson
- [OTP] RE: Linux stifles innovation... David D.W. Downey
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Bill Wendling
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... William T Wilson
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... Rik van Riel
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... James Sutherland
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... Mark Haney
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... David Woodhouse
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... Mark Haney
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... David D.W. Downey
- RE: Linux stifles innovation... James Sutherland
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Carlos Fernandez Sanz
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dan Hollis
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: Linux stifles innovation... Dan Hollis
- re: XOR [ was: Linux stifles inno... David Relson
- re: XOR [ was: Linux stifles inno... Dan Hollis
- re: XOR [ was: Linux stifles inno... Jonathan Morton
- re: XOR [ was: Linux stifles inno... David Relson