On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> But wait. These are just local statics. Surelty you can put these into >> struct ux500_msp instead? Here it looks like these will be used for >> all ports, so MSP2 will enable the pins requested by MSP1 etc >> completely broken. So put it into the struct ux500_msp state >> container from ux500_msp_i2s.h where it belongs. >> >> Refer to drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c when in trouble. This >> one is a good pinctrl example. > > How do you see the MSP1 and MSP3 usage protection working if I hide it > all away in MSP specific structs? Usage protection? Sorry not following. Please elaborate... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
