2012/8/26, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>:
> Namjae Jeon <linkinj...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> #define FAT_ENT_EOF(EOF_FAT32)
>>
>> there is no need to reset value of 'new' for FAT32 as the values is
>> already correct
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinj...@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawa...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/fat/fatent.c |    2 --
>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/fat/fatent.c b/fs/fat/fatent.c
>> index 31f08ab..af53815 100644
>> --- a/fs/fat/fatent.c
>> +++ b/fs/fat/fatent.c
>> @@ -186,8 +186,6 @@ static void fat16_ent_put(struct fat_entry *fatent,
>> int new)
>>
>>  static void fat32_ent_put(struct fat_entry *fatent, int new)
>>  {
>> -    if (new == FAT_ENT_EOF)
>> -            new = EOF_FAT32;
Hi OGAWA..
Okay, I will resend v2 patch after removing line.
Thanks.
>>
>
> Please remove this new line too. If it was removed,
>
> Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>
>
>>      WARN_ON(new & 0xf0000000);
>>      new |= le32_to_cpu(*fatent->u.ent32_p) & ~0x0fffffff;
>
> --
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to