On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:55:58PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static inline void set_io_apic_irq_attr(struct 
> io_apic_irq_attr *irq_attr,
>       irq_attr->polarity      = polarity;
>  }
>  
> +/* Intel specific interrupt remapping information */
>  struct irq_2_iommu {
>       struct intel_iommu *iommu;
>       u16 irte_index;
> @@ -108,6 +109,12 @@ struct irq_2_iommu {
>       u8  irte_mask;
>  };
>  
> +/* AMD specific interrupt remapping information */
> +struct irq_2_irte {
> +     u16 devid; /* Device ID for IRTE table */
> +     u16 index; /* Index into IRTE table*/
> +};
so irte_index like in iommu case would make the comment superfluous. However
the struct is already named _irte...
However, the "{Intel|AMD} specific..." is helpfull since irte and such are
present in both.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to