On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:56:04PM +0400, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> +struct event_entry {
> +     struct list_head node;
> +     u32              pid;
> +     union perf_event event[0];
> +};
> +
> +static LIST_HEAD(samples);
> +
> +static int perf_event__sched_stat(struct perf_tool *tool,
> +                                   union perf_event *event,
> +                                   struct perf_sample *sample,
> +                                   struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> +                                   struct machine *machine)
> +{
> +     const char *evname = NULL;
> +     uint32_t size;
> +     struct event_entry *ent;
> +     union perf_event *event_sw = NULL;
> +     struct perf_sample sample_sw;
> +     int sched_process_exit;
> +
> +     size = event->header.size;
> +
> +     evname = evsel->tp_format->name;
> +
> +     sched_process_exit = !strcmp(evname, "sched_process_exit");
> +
> +     if (!strcmp(evname, "sched_switch") ||  sched_process_exit) {
> +             list_for_each_entry(ent, &samples, node)
> +                     if (sample->pid == ent->pid)

I suspect what you're rather interested in is the sample tid.

> +                             break;
> +
> +             if (&ent->node != &samples) {
> +                     list_del(&ent->node);
> +                     free(ent);
> +             }
> +
> +             if (sched_process_exit)
> +                     return 0;
> +
> +             ent = malloc(size + sizeof(struct event_entry));
> +             if (ent == NULL)
> +                     die("malloc");
> +             ent->pid = sample->pid;

Ditto.

> +             memcpy(&ent->event, event, size);
> +             list_add(&ent->node, &samples);
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     } else if (!strncmp(evname, "sched_stat_", 11)) {
> +             u32 pid;
> +
> +             pid = raw_field_value(evsel->tp_format,
> +                                     "pid", sample->raw_data);

There you parse the pid from the trace content. That's fine because
it's actually the tid that is saved on the trace event. But this one
is not pid-namespace safe (it saves current->pid directly) while
sample->tid is pid-namespace safe (it uses task_pid_nr_ns).

So I suggest you to use sample->tid instead, plus that's going to be
consistant with what you did above.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to