On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote: > > Differences with v1: > > - The patch serie is re-arranged in a way that it helps reviews, following > > a plan by Thomas Gleixner > > - The PVOPS nomenclature is not used as it is not correct > > - The front-end message is adjusted with feedback by Thomas Gleixner, > > Stefano Stabellini and Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > This is much simpler to read and review. Just have a look at the > diffstats of the two series: > > 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > 6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > versus > > 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > 5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > 6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > The overall result is basically the same, but it's way simpler to look > at obvious and well done patches than checking whether a subtle copy > and paste bug happened in 3/5 of the first version. Copy and paste is > the #1 cause for subtle bugs. :) > > I'm waiting for the ack of Xen folks before taking it into tip.
They are OK by me. Konrad? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
