On 21/08/12 16:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote:
This new PVOPS is responsible to setup the kernel pagetables and
replace entirely x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and
x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done PVOPS work.
For performance the x86_64 stub is implemented as a macro to paging_init()
rather than an actual function stub.
Huch, using a macro for an once per boot time call is really a massive
performance improvement.
It's confusing and wrong. You just use a macro because x86_64 does not
need any extra setups aside of paging_init().
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
index 849be14..c1e910a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct x86_init_ops x86_init __initdata = {
},
.paging = {
+ .pagetable_init = native_pagetable_init,
I'd prefer to see these patches implemented differently.
#1 Remove the base argument from pagetable_setup_start (leave
pagetable_setup_done() alone).
#2 Rename pagetable_setup_start to pagetable_init,
native_pagetable_setup_start to native_pagetable_init and
xen_pagetable_setup_start to xen_pagetable_init
#3 Instead of copying the whole native_pagetable_setup_start()
function and deleting it later, move the paging_init() call from
setup.c to native_pagetable_init() and xen_pagetable_init()
and define native_pagetable_init as paging_init() for x86_64
#4 Move the code from xen_pagetable_setup_done() into
xen_pagetable_init() and remove the now unused
pagetable_setup_done().
That's less code shuffling and pointless copying which makes the
review way easier.
I've followed these steps in a new patch series (integrating suggestions
from Konrad and Stefano too).
Attilio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
