> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c 
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index 7f2739e..0d3d63a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -2008,6 +2008,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>               break;
>  
>       case 28: /* Atom */
> +     case 54: /* Cedariew */

Ack. We currently miss some more 32nm Atoms too, will send patches soon.

>               memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, atom_hw_cache_event_ids,
>                      sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c 
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> index 520b426..da02e9c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> @@ -686,7 +686,8 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom(void)
>        * to have an operational LBR which can freeze
>        * on PMU interrupt
>        */
> -     if (boot_cpu_data.x86_mask < 10) {
> +     if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 28
> +         && boot_cpu_data.x86_mask < 10) {

Is that correct?

-Andi

-- 
[email protected] -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to