On 08/09/2012 03:11 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:

@@ -3187,13 +3217,16 @@ static int __devinit azx_probe(struct pci_dev *pci,
        if (patch[dev] && *patch[dev]) {
                snd_printk(KERN_ERR SFX "Applying patch firmware '%s'\n",
                           patch[dev]);
-               err = request_firmware(&chip->fw, patch[dev], &pci->dev);
+               err = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, true, patch[dev],
+                                             &pci->dev, GFP_KERNEL, card,
+                                             azx_firmware_cb);
                if (err < 0)
                        goto out_free;
+               chip->probe_deferred = 1;

I might be out on deep water here, but isn't this racy? Or is azx_firmware_cb somehow guaranteed not to execute before this function has exited?

        }
  #endif /* CONFIG_SND_HDA_PATCH_LOADER */

-       if (!chip->disabled) {
+       if (!chip->disabled && !chip->probe_deferred) {
                err = azx_probe_continue(chip);
                if (err < 0)
                        goto out_free;




--
David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
https://launchpad.net/~diwic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to