Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Dongjin Kim wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I didn't use -M and I couldn't see any difference with the it. > > Did I make something wrong on that patch? > > No, I think it's just git being less smart about file moves than I was > hoping > for. It might do the right thing if you do the patch in two steps: > Yeah, in this case, git does not work just as we expected :-(
> 1. rename exynos4210.dtsi to exynos4.dtsi and add a one-line > exynos4210.dtsi > file that just includes exynos4.dtsi. > > 2. do all the changes for moving contents back from exynos4.dtsi into > exynos4210.dtsi and exynos4412.dtsi. > > Not sure if it's worth it though. Hehehe, but I did with separated commit as per your comment and it was ok, then squashed, same...uhm...I think, we don't need to keep two commits here... > Your version is probably good enough > if there are no tools to do a better job automatically. > I agree with Arnd's opinion and I will review in detail soon. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
