On 7/31/2012 8:33 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:17 AM, <kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com> >> >> Hi >> >> This is trivial fixes of mempolicy meory corruption issues. There >> are independent patches each ather. and, they don't change userland >> ABIs. >> >> Thanks. >> >> changes from v1: fix some typo of changelogs s. >> >> ----------------------------------------------- >> KOSAKI Motohiro (6): >> Revert "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle >> vma->vm_policy linkages" >> mempolicy: Kill all mempolicy sharing >> mempolicy: fix a race in shared_policy_replace() >> mempolicy: fix refcount leak in mpol_set_shared_policy() >> mempolicy: fix a memory corruption by refcount imbalance in >> alloc_pages_vma() >> MAINTAINERS: Added MEMPOLICY entry >> >> MAINTAINERS | 7 +++ >> mm/mempolicy.c | 151 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- >> mm/shmem.c | 9 ++-- >> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > I don't see these patches queued anywhere. They aren't in linux-next, > mmotm, or Linus' tree. Did these get dropped? Is the revert still > needed?
Sorry. my fault. yes, it is needed. currently, Some LTP was fail since Mel's "mm: mempolicy: Let vma_merge and vma_split handle vma->vm_policy linkages" patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
