On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 01:43:42PM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 11:05:23AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Any reason not to put this in the tools directory? > At the moment the repo is very bare bones. I was thinking more of > an automated testing framework written in sh or similar. So it might > grow out into its own repository anyhow. It'd need to be pretty enormous for that I'd expect. > > All these functions just seem to be implementing the default behaviour, > > why are they needed? > Hm will remove them for now but it would be useful for these to be set by > the user via debugfs or similar. These were mainly stubs for that sort > of thing. I figured that was the idea but until there's code controlling them it's better to just not have anything. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
