* Tetsuo Handa <penguin-ker...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> Bisected to 2a8c0883 "time: Move xtime_nsec adjustment 
> underflow handling timekeeping_adjust".
> 
> Would you check?

probably caused by this stray return in timekeeping_adjust():

        } else
                return;

which should really be a proper goto - like the (totally 
untested!) patch below.

Does this fix the bug for you?

Thanks,

        Ingo

-------------

Subject: time: Fix adjustment cleanup bug in timekeeping_adjust()

Also make the flow more readable by properly balancing curly 
braces.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>


diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 2988bc8..e16af19 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -923,20 +923,22 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(struct timekeeper *tk, s64 
offset)
                if (likely(error <= interval))
                        adj = 1;
                else
-                       adj = timekeeping_bigadjust(tk, error, &interval,
-                                                       &offset);
-       } else if (error < -interval) {
-               /* See comment above, this is just switched for the negative */
-               error >>= 2;
-               if (likely(error >= -interval)) {
-                       adj = -1;
-                       interval = -interval;
-                       offset = -offset;
-               } else
-                       adj = timekeeping_bigadjust(tk, error, &interval,
-                                                       &offset);
-       } else
-               return;
+                       adj = timekeeping_bigadjust(tk, error, &interval, 
&offset);
+       } else {
+               if (error < -interval) {
+                       /* See comment above, this is just switched for the 
negative */
+                       error >>= 2;
+                       if (likely(error >= -interval)) {
+                               adj = -1;
+                               interval = -interval;
+                               offset = -offset;
+                       } else {
+                               adj = timekeeping_bigadjust(tk, error, 
&interval, &offset);
+                       }
+               } else {
+                       goto out_adjust;
+               }
+       }
 
        if (unlikely(tk->clock->maxadj &&
                (tk->mult + adj > tk->clock->mult + tk->clock->maxadj))) {
@@ -999,6 +1001,7 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(struct timekeeper *tk, s64 
offset)
        tk->xtime_nsec -= offset;
        tk->ntp_error -= (interval - offset) << tk->ntp_error_shift;
 
+out_adjust:
        /*
         * It may be possible that when we entered this function, xtime_nsec
         * was very small.  Further, if we're slightly speeding the clocksource
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to