On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> So much for compromise, I thought we had agreed that at least some of the 
> checks for !name, in_interrupt() or bad size values should be moved out 
> from under the #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, but this wasn't done.  This 
> discussion would be irrelevent if we actually did what we talked about.

I didn't want to change the checks at the last minute and invalidate 
testing in linux-next but I'm more than happy to merge such a patch when 
the merge window closes.

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to